The Gujarat government has proposed amendments to the Gujarat Registration of Marriages Act, 2006, introducing new procedures that would require parental notification and a verification period before a marriage is officially registered. The proposal has triggered widespread discussion across legal, political, and social circles in the state.
Key Proposed Changes
- Mandatory Declaration: Couples applying for marriage registration would need to submit a notarised declaration stating whether their parents have been informed about the marriage.
- Parental Notification by Authorities: Within 10 working days of receiving an application, the Assistant Registrar would formally notify the parents of both parties through official communication channels such as SMS, WhatsApp, or physical notice.
- 30 Day Verification Period: Registration would be granted only after a mandatory 30 day verification window. This period would allow for objections, scrutiny, or clarification of documents before final approval.
- Expanded Documentation Requirements: Applicants may be required to submit Aadhaar details, parents addresses and contact information, and signatures of two witnesses. The aim, according to officials, is to strengthen documentation and prevent identity related fraud.
Government’s Stated Objective
The amendment proposal was tabled in February 2026. State officials have described the move as a preventive measure against cases involving alleged identity concealment and fraudulent marriages. The government has also opened a 30 day public consultation period, inviting suggestions and objections before finalising the amendments.
Support from Social Groups
Certain community organisations have reportedly supported stricter safeguards in marriage registration processes, stating that better verification mechanisms could help prevent misuse of personal identity.
Legal and Constitutional Debate
The proposal has also raised constitutional concerns among legal experts.
Article 21 Concerns: Some legal analysts argue that compulsory parental notification could conflict with Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, which guarantees the right to life and personal liberty, including the right of consenting adults to choose their partners. The Supreme Court has previously ruled in multiple judgments that adult individuals have the autonomy to marry without interference from family or the state.
Political Reactions
Some political groups have expressed support, calling the amendments a protective measure. Others have adopted a cautious stance, indicating that the proposal must be examined carefully for constitutional validity.
What Happens Next
The state government will review public feedback during the consultation window. Only after this process will the final version of the amendment be drafted and potentially passed.
Why This Matters
If implemented in its current form, the amendments could significantly change the marriage registration process in Gujarat by increasing verification layers, formalising parental notification, and extending the approval timeline. The issue sits at the intersection of individual rights, family involvement, and state oversight, making it one of the most closely watched policy debates in the state this year.